4

I am running geth. Via txpool.content.pending I am looking at the transactions that my node currently sees. It gives me a bunch of transactions by their transaction hash (I think), in the below example I think the transaction has is 0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8. This transaction has two child objects and I would like to know what those are. I am talking about 214823 and 214824. What are those indices and why are there two transaction objects under the same hash? nonce, to and value are different, hence I am wondering why those would show up under the same transaction hash.

0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8: {
    214823: [{
        blockHash: "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
        blockNumber: null,
        from: "0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8",
        gas: "0x15f90",
        gasPrice: "0x4a817c800",
        hash: "0xf600f6000087513137182f9aee222618bb813e17cd1c550e710bfe532fc6c353",
        input: "0x",
        nonce: "0x34727",
        to: "0xd3642cbc286df002d4bba68f4dcdc00d19ccd553",
        transactionIndex: null,
        value: "0xde1a377aa686c6c"
    }],
    214824: [{
        blockHash: "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
        blockNumber: null,
        from: "0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8",
        gas: "0x15f90",
        gasPrice: "0x4a817c800",
        hash: "0x588bdf42eaf5e049c3a098be2104a7c5c65495154a5cacdb0161db158716ef0d",
        input: "0x",
        nonce: "0x34728",
        to: "0x4fed6e010dcdc0bf50c0cbc98ed33f1991b172da",
        transactionIndex: null,
        value: "0xde79cc181013590"
    }]
  }

1 Answer 1

4

These transactions are from a mining pool. You can see the frequently mined blocks in 0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8.

What you saw in txpool.content.pending are just two pending transactions representing the transactions that the miner is paying to the miners in the pool. Here is the transaction list for the same account.

This mining pool is run by ethermine.org. You can see this by browsing one of the blocks from the list above. For example, block 1756807 has the Extra Data of ethermine.org (US1) (Hex:0x65746865726d696e652e6f7267202855533129).

The two transactions are under the same hash because are from the same address. The hash that you are referring to is not the transaction hash, but the address.

Here's the difference in length between an account and a transaction hash:

Account: 0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8

  • 40 hex characters, 20 bytes

Tx hash: 0x1f86911381fcb732d2a41e5aff428f6aa7916e6fd87e39a19d023fe7c0afdb0b

  • 64 hex characters, 32 bytes

See What happens when a transaction nonce is too high? for more information about transaction nonces.

1
  • thanks, I did not realize that they are ordered by sender but this is of course obvious because the from has the same entry. just for clarification: the second index (214823, 214824) is the nonce in decimal representation.
    – SCBuergel
    Commented Jun 23, 2016 at 13:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.