6

Running parity node, connected to Kovan testnet.
Contract Address: 0x354Db5AE17b11fbc01A8a146B63506b1d90872E0

Using a nodejs app + web3 to send/sign transactions with the private key corresponding to this address : https://kovan.etherscan.io/address/0x02c52ceee9671b99152dff00172a53759d8b081a

which is non-empty.

With an instance of the contract, its method calls run fine, eg: var response = await tokenContract.methods.awardToken(addressParser(address),1).send({from:Account.public}) console.log(response)

Pulls up the parity ui signer in order to sign. Transaction goes through fine.

However, I must sign and send this transaction using just web3 -- I eventually want to deploy this to an IoT device. There will be no parity ui.

let tx = {}
tx.nonce = await web3.eth.getTransactionCount(Account.public)
tx.from = Account.public;
tx.to = tokenContract.options.address;
tx.data = tokenContract.methods.awardToken(addressParser(address),1).encodeABI();
// //tx.gas = await web3.eth.getGasPrice();
tx.gas = 22888

which yields a tx object.

I have Account object containing the private/public key pair, from:

var Account = web3.eth.accounts.privateKeyToAccount(privateKey);

But when I sign and send the signed transaction, I get insufficient gas from the sender's account:

let signedTx = await Account.signTransaction(tx, Account.privateKey);
console.log(signedTx)

{ messageHash: '0xaa18a8ce5eb123ce13ed1b64c0653b4846fc0303bfc3814da06d9ae92dd42f2a',   v: '0x78',   r: '0x0f04a9fb70676a7e47d9673399c9e2339ab425b53df389e19e68342e9cc9f56e',   s: '0x2adf857a27b95fe43fa69073b2d3ff40d5c7f963d04aa91afe6b388152e05746',   rawTransaction: '0xf8ab108609184e72a0008302710094354db5ae17b11fbc01a8a146b63506b1d90872e080b844ded2d0f4 000000000000000000000000db12813b2fd2651f11278218b4ebf69b7d1a8a7d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000178a00f04a9fb70676a7e47d9673399c9e2339ab425b53df389e19e68342e9cc9f56ea02adf857a27b9 5fe43fa69073b2d3ff40d5c7f963d04aa91afe6b388152e05746' }

var receipt = await web3.eth.sendSignedTransaction(signedTx.rawTransaction);
console.log(receipt)

Error: Returned error: Insufficient funds. The account you tried to send transaction from does not have e nough funds. Required 114440000000000 and got: 0.

I must be missing something basic... web3.eth.defaultAccount = public key, which was derived from corresponding supplied private key, and there is a sufficient balance in the account ( verified using web3.eth.getBalance(Account.public)).

Parity, when receiving the rawtransaction is associating the signature with an entirely different publickey/wallet address (of 0 balance).

5
  • web3.eth.accounts.recoverTransaction(signedTx.rawTransaction) showing different public key than what's expected. there is no problem, im just doing something silly. bbl
    – nacmonad
    Commented Sep 7, 2017 at 14:14
  • now i got the appropriate public address funded (derp), the Kovan gas required went up a ridiculous amount "Required 1393939200000000000 and got: 1000000000000000000." Is Kovan being attacked atm?
    – nacmonad
    Commented Sep 7, 2017 at 16:20
  • it looks like your gas price is set super high, like to 1,000 gwei, when the standard is normally 20 gwei. Try lowering your gas price. Also your gas is set to 160,000 which is much higher than the 22888 you set it to in your example. Not sure if that's something you changed in debugging, or something a library changed, but those two things together are making the gas costs of the transaction very high. Commented Sep 11, 2017 at 7:25
  • I have the same problem , who can help ?
    – 陈东泽
    Commented Nov 1, 2017 at 16:36
  • @陈东泽 if your problem is also that you can recoverTransaction to a different public key, it might be a private key format error. See me answering my own question at ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/45646/…
    – Bigman
    Commented Apr 15, 2018 at 0:47

1 Answer 1

0

Apart from from a couple details you were missing, the most important thing you left out is to serialize the transaction. You can find a solution to all these issues in an answer I provided here (That one uses web3 0.xx, but that should not matter.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.