Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with rlpx
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 7044
For questons about RLPx, a cryptographic peer-to-peer network and protocol suite which provides a general-purpose transport and interface for applications to communicate via a p2p network.
1
vote
Where are precise details of the Kademlia spec for RLPx?
There is a rough, incomplete, explanation of v4 discovery protocol and an explanation of the v5 discovery protocol at this draft documents location:
https://github.com/fjl/p2p-drafts
- 1,248
1
vote
R,S,V ECDSA packet signatures
I think I found it. Basically this code from the bitcoin core libraries define the v value
*recid = (overflow ? 2 : 0) | (secp256k1_fe_is_odd(&r.y) ? 1 : 0);
That gets added to 27 for Ethereum, …
- 1,248
22
votes
Accepted
What is the distinction between libp2p, devp2p and RLPx?
So in terms of protocol the RLPx and DEVp2p handshake steps can be considered one thing. The RLPx protocol is meaningless without the DEVp2p handshake step. … The protocol id is left to the RLPx subprotocol/transport. So DEVP2P cannot fulfill its design goal without a transport that cooperates.
In short it is best to see DEVP2P and RLPx as one thing. …
- 1,248