Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with interfaces
Search options not deleted
user 64551
1
vote
implementation is in different address
Well, it turns out that the comptroller address is a proxy contract. A proxy contract is a contract that forwards the function call to an implementation contract. It is a technique to enable upgradeab …
- 1,702
0
votes
Accepted
Access contract using instance vs Interface
You don't see a difference because you are on the same file when you deploy.
If you had separated contractA and B into two file and deployed contractA and tried to call a function updateX from contrac …
- 1,702
0
votes
1
answer
22
views
implementation is in different address
I have a weird situation. Here is the contract address of Compound Comptroller contract.
However, the address above doesn't implement the contract. Actual implementation is in different address. What …
- 1,702