Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with reentrant-attacks
Search options not deleted
user 5142
Questions related to "reentrancy vulnerability" or "reentrant attack", where untrusted code reenters a contract and manipulates state. http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/1317/reentrant-contracts https://github.com/LeastAuthority/ethereum-analyses/blob/master/GasEcon.md
1
vote
SMT Checker : Unexpected " BMC: Insufficient funds happens here"
When the contract makes a transfer it does not use your state variable balance, but rather the balance of the contract as in address(this).balance. Since that balance is not being checked, transfer(am …
- 366