Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with view
Search options not deleted
user 42354
1
vote
Are pure functions and events verifiable/guaranteed
The issue you are raising is not specific to pure and view functions. …
- 3,620
1
vote
Do view functions cause reentrancy vulnerabulity?
View functions cannot modify the state, as specified here. It means that they cannot make any permanent change to the blockchain such as changing the ether or tokens balances. … Therefore, reentrancy is not an issue with View functions. …
- 3,620
2
votes
Standard work-around for using a Solidity constant array (which is not supported) in pure fu...
I think that this should work.
pragma solidity >=0.7.0 <0.9.0;
contract MyContract {
function foo(uint i, uint j) external pure returns (uint) {
uint8[16] memory x = [10, 2, 6, 42, 19, 5 …
- 3,620