Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with uint256
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 19510
3
votes
Accepted
How to set multiple unit64 values in a uint256 variable
Your smart contract code is okay, but this is probably simpler:
pragma solidity 0.5.7;
contract Uncombine {
function getVariables(uint256 combined) external pure returns (uint64 variable1, uint64 …
- 28.1k
2
votes
Accepted
Mapping with iterating uint as identifier - multiple transactions in the same block
No, it doesn't matter whether transactions are in the same block or not. Each transaction is processed on its own, sequentially. The code you propose is fine, though an array may make more sense.
- 28.1k
2
votes
Accepted
Solidity. Return a Sruct that lives inside an array
You forgot to name your variable. You only gave it a type. Try this:
function getStudent(uint id) ... {
return (students[id].name, students[id].ethAddress, ...);
}
- 28.1k
0
votes
Create token exchange by defining decimal values
The typical solution is the one you alluded to. Use a big multiplier.
E.g. instead of storing 1, 1.5, and 1.75 store 1000, 1500, and 1750. More typical in smart contracts, because ether natively uses …
- 28.1k