If user account A makes a call to smart contract B that then makes a call to smart contract C, is it at all possible to have smart contract B cover the gas fees of this transaction?

Essentially what I am interested in is knowing whether what OP thought was the default behaviour in this question is at all possible. Of course I mean for the contract to be explicitly allowing this. I read a few years ago that Serenity was going to allow for a mechanism that lets the contract pay, any insight on whether that was actually implemented is appreciated.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.