1

I'm trying to use Uniswapv2Router with Truffle and Ganache, but haven't been able to identify what I'm doing wrong. I'm using addLiquidty method as follows: await uniswapV2Router02.addLiquidity(token0.address, token1.address, 500, 250, 250 , 125, accounts[0], 1618158769);Which throws error Error: Returned error: VM Exception while processing transaction: revert ds-math-sub-underflow -- Reason given: ds-math-sub-underflow.

But If I comment out .minto(to) The code executes properly until there.

    function addLiquidity(
        address tokenA,
        address tokenB,
        uint amountADesired,
        uint amountBDesired,
        uint amountAMin,
        uint amountBMin,
        address to,
        uint deadline
    ) external ensure(deadline) returns (uint amountA, uint amountB, uint liquidity) {
        (amountA, amountB) = _addLiquidity(tokenA, tokenB, amountADesired, amountBDesired, amountAMin, amountBMin);
        address pair = UniswapV2Library.pairFor(factory, tokenA, tokenB);
        TransferHelper.safeTransferFrom(tokenA, msg.sender, pair, amountA);
        TransferHelper.safeTransferFrom(tokenB, msg.sender, pair, amountB);
        IUniswapV2Pair(pair);//.mint(to);
    }

This happens even if I have a simple mint implementation just for testing what is going on.

  function mint(address to) external lock returns (uint liquidity) {
        liquidity = 3;
    }
2

The problem was because when using UniswapV2Factory, only the precompiled UniswapV2Factory contract in the build directories from @uniswap should be deployed as stated in docs https://uniswap.org/docs/v2/smart-contract-integration/quick-start/. So, even if I commented out something on my UniswapV2Pair contract, it had no effect, because UniswapV2Factory uses a precompiled UniswapV2Pair contract as well. On the other hand, the ds-math-sub-underflow error was because on the UniswapV2Pair contract, the function mint(address to) retrieves its balance of each token, and because it hadn't enough, liquidity = Math.sqrt(amount0.mul(amount1)).sub(MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY); caused an underflow.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.