1

There is no shortage of the news on stablecoin censorship, in particular blacklisting of Ethereum addresses:

Tether has been blacklisting Ethereum addresses that hold USDT for a couple of years now—this year alone, Tether has blacklisted 24 addresses that hold a total of $5.51 million USDT in summation. [...] Tether has blacklisted a total of 39 out of the 1.47 million Tether addresses that exist, which represents a total of 0.00002% of all tether addresses. When a tether address is blacklisted, it can’t send, receive, or redeem USDT.

Assuming that the said stablecoin issuers are not miners/validators, how are they able to do censor sending and receiving? Does such censorship involve also NFTs, Eth, and other erc-20 tokens? Could similar censorship be done by MakerDao?

2

They own the contracts.

For example, one of the Tether contracts is named BlackList. This contains a mapping:

mapping (address => bool) public isBlackListed;

...which can be updated by the owners using addBlackList().

When an address is added to the blacklist, that address can no longer use its Tether balance.

1
  • Does MakerDao own like contacts and could they practice similar censorship with respect to DAI? – Jerzy Brzóska Feb 11 at 10:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.