0

That question might sound completely trollish but it is not. Imagine that eventually all nodes are turned off except for a single, centralized supercomputer which did all the contract-executing work. (Mining would still be decentralized.) What would be lost, security-wise, under that scenario?

closed as unclear what you're asking by Waqar Lim Oct 22 '16 at 20:10

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

This question is hard to parse because you say mining is still decentralized, but a centralized computer does all the contract-executing work. In the current design contract execution is the main function of mining, so it's not clear what you're thinking the miners would do.

I suppose you could have a network where the miners just did time-stamping of transactions rather than executing scripts. In theory you should then be able to make script execution completely deterministic, so anybody could set up their own node and run the transactions in the time-stamped order, and in theory everyone should be able to get the same result. But you wouldn't need that to be a single central node; Anybody could run a node that ran the calculations.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.