The well known ᴅᴀᴏ hack didn’t affect ether balances of theᴅᴀᴏ but balances of rewardAccount.

That’s why I’m talking about the hack version which affected contract balances of theᴅᴀᴏ itself.

With the help blockchair, I could get the input data being used, so I know it’also about SplitDao, but how the hacker could both set the SpliData on it’s ᴅᴀᴏ proposal and _recipient inside the targeted reentrency contract ?
By looking at the code, this set of conditions seems mutually exclusive to me.

  • Not a Duplicate ! I’m talking about an other version of the hack : not the original one. – user2284570 Aug 15 '19 at 13:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.