I hope this question isn't too vague, but it would really help me to get some advice on from the community on this subject.

Which testnet is the most suitable for testing of a dapp? Do testnet transactions times vary greatly? Is there any one testnet that is more consistent? Are testnet faucets generally always available and dependable?

1 Answer 1


Here's a complete list of the testnets: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/17101/31933

The most popular ones are Ropsten and Rinkeby. Ropsten is more close to the mainnet as it's PoW-based and therefore works in a similar fashion. Rinkeby is PoA-based so it works a bit differently but it's faster.

The block times (and therefore also transaction times) vary greatly in testnets (at least PoW-based) as there is no monetary incentive. For example here you can see some latest Ropsten blocks: https://ropsten.etherscan.io/ . On the other hand, Rinkeby has stable block times: https://rinkeby.etherscan.io/ .

The faucets (at least for Ropsten) tend to be offline sometimes.

If you want to be thorough with your testing, you can test in the following order:

1) Local blockchain (Ganache). Run all your unit tests here.

2) Rinkeby for integration testing (faster than Ropsten)

3) Ropsten for trying to make sure it'd work correctly also in PoW network

4) Mainnet

I personally skip phase two.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.