It has been stated that since the creator of the DAO have called the contracts code as the only legal statement, all things that the code allows are legitimate. As a counterargument it was said that code can't be a legal contract in most juristictions. What is true? http://pastebin.com/CcGUBgDG
closed as primarily opinion-based by Waqar Lim Jun 18 '16 at 14:38
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.