# Rock scissors paper game in Solidity

For a homework problem, I need to write a contract for a rock-paper-scissors game for two players who would deposit the same amount of money then the winner will get both deposits. I am new to Solidity and don't know where to start.

If the assignment is meant for people who are only starting their Solidity path and the assignment really is written as you said, I would argue that the assignment is a really bad one. Mostly because:

1) To do it right is actually quite complicated. Check out my other answer and @Tjaden Hess's comment on it.

2) To do it wrong leads to wrong kind of thinking.

There are many ways to do it wrong and it's really impossible to say which level of "wrongness" is expected of a "correct" answer.

• im experiencing it right now Nov 4, 2018 at 16:01
• From the question added in the edit, it looks like the assignment is looking for a commit-reveal protocol, which is the correct way to implement this. A 1-phase solution is simply incorrect Nov 5, 2018 at 1:14

I assume this is for some study reasons.

If you need to do this for any serious reasons (for a company or so), you'd face serious issues with synchronization: if player A sends his transaction with Rock, player B can just check the transaction and send his transaction with Paper as he knows what player A played.

Nevertheless, for a basic idea you could use something like the following. Note that the concept of "Rock" is here represented as number 1 in variable `move`, "Paper" as number 2 and "Scissors" as number 3:

``````pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

contract RPS {

uint256 previousMove;
uint256 previousStake;

function play(uint256 move) payable {

// TODO: make sure stakes are the same

if (previousMove == 0) {
// If there is no move before this, make this the first move and Ethers stay in the contract
previousMove = move;
previousStake = msg.value;
previousPlayer = msg.sender;
return;
}

if (previousMove == 1) {
if (move == 2) {
// ...

// if wins:

// if loses:
}
}
// ...

}
}
``````

This is a very crude version but you'll hopefully get the point.

• hey thanks for the reply , yeah it is for study reason so basically u say that palyer 2 is cheating ? Nov 3, 2018 at 18:37
• I'm not saying player 2 is cheating. I'm saying it would be trivial for player 2 to cheat. Nov 3, 2018 at 18:38
• ok i'm running the code in value box i input the number of ether but in play field what should input ? Nov 3, 2018 at 18:49
• move i know , but address? Nov 3, 2018 at 18:54
• You can avoid the cheating issue by doing a 2-phase game. Fist submit the hash of the move, with a salt, then reveal the move after both players have committed. Nov 3, 2018 at 20:08