0

According to the following article, Zcash provide a high level of "fungibility". compared to other crypto-currencies.

Article link: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/z/zcash.asp

fungibility definition in Oxford dictionary:

(of goods contracted for without an individual specimen being specified) replaceable by another identical item; mutually interchangeable.

So, according to this definition, fungibility is NOT related to "privacy" (this is main concept Zcash provides). So, why other crypto-currencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum does NOT have the same level of fungibility of Zcash?

closed as off-topic by Ha ĐANG, flygoing, Richard Horrocks, Ismael, Achala Dissanayake Sep 12 '18 at 17:10

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question does not appear to be about Ethereum, the decentralized application platform and smart contract enabled blockchain, within the scope defined in the help center." – Ha ĐANG, flygoing, Richard Horrocks, Ismael, Achala Dissanayake
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Could you link the article? – ohsully Sep 12 '18 at 15:49
  • Sorry, it is now added. – Questioner Sep 13 '18 at 8:51
1

I Googled zcash and fungibility, found this one article from @dnaleor on Steemit. Assuming that's the one you meant, the article was saying that in a cryptocurrency world where every transaction is globally visible, privacy is important for fungibility.

Let's say you're running an organization which is being censored by the government and you're paying admins in BTC. Everything is public, so anybody can see which addresses are performing transactions. If the government found out which address belonged to you, they would then be able to track all the coins that flowed through your account, even when the people you paid tried to use them elsewhere. Essentially, they could mark your coins as "dirty" money which is a criminal offense to own.

On the other hand, let's say you paid admins in fungible fiat cash. When your admins go to buy food with that cash, there's basically no way to know where that specific dollar bill came from. Any $20 bill is interchangeable, whereas you can uniquely identify "one bitcoin" by all the transactions it was involved in.

So long as transactions are publicly tied to identifiable addresses, you can't get real fungibility -- privacy really is a part of the equation.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.