When I run a particular transaction and log the receipt, I am getting different results depending on if my EVM is Geth or Ganache. Specifically, Ganache returns receipt.logs[0].type: 'mined' while in Geth, there is no type member of logs[0] and there is instead receipt.logs[0].removed: 'false' (the receipt from Ganache has no removed member.). The rest of the receipt looks pretty similar between the two EVMs, ignoring member order.

Is there a reliable source about what fields my program should expect to find in an Ethereum transaction receipt? If so, does one (or both) of these two implementations need a bug report for being inconsistent with that?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.