These may answer the question:



Of course you want to be secure, but assuming that running a light client is relatively secure for a user, my question was more about whether running a light client vs not running any client would be more secure for Ethereum. Obviously if you can run a full node or a full state node or a miner that will increase the security of the network, but if your computers can't feasibly do that, then a light client is the only option compared to not running any client.l

  • can you elaborate on what you mean with "doing nothing"? On the first instinct "doing nothing" sounds extremely secure as you have no real attack surface by doing anything. But perhaps this is not what you mean with "do nothing"
    – ligi
    Apr 10, 2018 at 12:50
  • I updated my question.
    – James Ray
    Apr 10, 2018 at 23:44

1 Answer 1


Reading https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Light-client-protocol, it seems that it depends on the nature of the light client. If the client verifies any transactions, then that would increase security of the network. If it justs downloads them, then it seems that it would not increase the security of the network.

Of all four protocols on that page, the third protocol validates transactions, which would increase the security of the state, the second helps to ensure availability of transactions, the first helps to know the state of an accounts, and the fourth allows to watch event logs.

The purpose of the light client protocol is to allow users in low-capacity environments (embedded smart property environments, smartphones, browser extensions, some desktops, etc) to maintain a high-security assurance about the current state of some particular part of the Ethereum state or verify the execution of a transaction. Although full security is only possible for a full node, the light client protocol allows light nodes processing about 1KB of data per 2 minutes to receive data from the network about the parts of the state that are of concern to them, and be sure that the data is correct provided that the majority of miners are correctly following the protocol, and perhaps even only provided that at least one honest verifying full node exists.

So the security of light clients does rely on the assumption of an honest majority of miners (or perhaps that just one honest verifying full node exists).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.