11

I'm working on a puzzle where msg.sender != tx.origin, so the implication is that the caller needs to be a contract or at least something in between the calling account.

But extcodesize(caller) == 0 also needs to be true. So the caller needs to be an address or externally owned account.

How can both of these be true? Can the caller's codesize ever be 0 if not an address/EOA?

4
  • Is caller msg.sender? Apr 8, 2018 at 17:38
  • Should be. caller is assembly so is not loggable. But caller is the calling contract, or at least typically it is.
    – Joe Blow
    Apr 8, 2018 at 17:46
  • Yeah I was just wondering, no idea what the caller really means. Apr 8, 2018 at 17:50
  • Actually, by the documentation, it's not the "call sender" in case of delegatecall. That might be a part of the solution. But don't ask me how. Apr 8, 2018 at 17:52

1 Answer 1

12

All things must have a beginning

I think you're getting called from a contract constructor before it's committed to the chain.

At this point, it will have a (theoretical) address but no code yet in the chain. It will only get code size after the transaction completes and the block is accepted.

1
  • 1
    If this answered your question, please mark it as the correct answer. If not let me know so I can further assist.
    – supakaity
    Apr 10, 2018 at 9:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.