3

This question already has an answer here:

In Mist you can call functions of contracts in two ways:

  • On the left panel, to call functions that read from a contract (the result is immediate).
  • On the right panel, to call functions that write into a contract (for this a new transaction is made, so it asks you to unlock the account, and some gas is spent).

I want to know how to do the equivalent with nodejs' web3.

In the first case, I already succeeded, with something like this, e.g. when the function I want to call is called foo(), receives an account(string) and returns a uint256:

var Web3 = require('./node_modules/web3/lib/web3');
var fs = require('fs');

// dont override global variable
if (typeof window !== 'undefined' && typeof window.Web3 === 'undefined') {
   window.Web3 = Web3;
}

module.exports = Web3;

var web3 = new Web3();
web3.setProvider(new web3.providers.HttpProvider('http://localhost:8545'));

var theAddressWhereMyContractLives = "0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413";
var abiContractContent = fs.readFileSync('./bin/Token.abi', 'utf8' );
var abiJsonContract = JSON.parse(abiContractContent);
var daoTokenContract = web3.eth.contract(abiJsonContract); 
var contractInstance = daoTokenContract.at(theAddressWhereMyContractLives);

var accounts = web3.eth.accounts;
accounts.forEach(function(account) {
    var result = contractInstance.foo(account);
}

However, I don't know how to do this to write into a contract. Because, if I do it in the same way (let's say the non-readonly function is called bar and receives an address and a number):

contractInstance.bar(account, 1);

I get this error:

/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/formatters.js:271
    throw new Error('invalid address');
    ^

Error: invalid address
    at inputAddressFormatter (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/formatters.js:271:11)
    at inputTransactionFormatter (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/formatters.js:97:20)
    at /home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/method.js:89:28
    at Array.map (native)
    at Method.formatInput (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/method.js:88:32)
    at Method.toPayload (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/method.js:114:23)
    at Eth.send [as sendTransaction] (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/method.js:139:30)
    at SolidityFunction.sendTransaction (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/function.js:133:26)
    at SolidityFunction.execute (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/node_modules/web3/lib/web3/function.js:219:37)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/home/myuser/Documents/Code/ethContractPlayground/approver_test.js:57:18)

And I guess this is normal, because I didn't send a transaction. I guess I need to figure out the way to call bar(account,1) inside the inputData payload of a transaction. How to do it with nodejs+web3? Thanks

marked as duplicate by Community May 24 '16 at 7:28

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

4

Setting the defaultAccount should help with writing to contract in your case web3.eth.defaultAccount=web3.eth.accounts[0]

  • thanks for the answer, but it only partially helps, I mean, the exception is not thrown anymore, but I don't see the transaction in the blockchain – user1623521 May 24 '16 at 2:18
  • sometimes it shows up, sometimes it doesn't, meh – user1623521 May 24 '16 at 5:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.