1

In Truffle's pet-shop tutorial. Adoption.sol is --

pragma solidity ^0.4.19;

contract Adoption {
    address[16] public adopters;

    // Adopting a pet
    function adopt(uint petId) public returns (uint) {
        require(petId >= 0 && petId <= 15);

        adopters[petId] = msg.sender;

        return petId;
    }   
}

TestAdoption.sol is --

pragma solidity ^0.4.19;

import "truffle/Assert.sol";
import "truffle/DeployedAddresses.sol";
import "../contracts/Adoption.sol";

contract TestAdoption {
    Adoption adoption = Adoption(DeployedAddresses.Adoption());

    // Testing retrieval of a single pet's owner
    function testGetAdopterAddressByPetId() public {
        // Expected owner is this contract
        address expected = this;

        address adopter = adoption.adopters(8);

        Assert.equal(adopter, expected, "Owner of pet ID 8.");
    }   
}

My question is on the line address adopter = adoption.adopters(8); in TestAdoption.sol I thought adoption.adopters is an array and its element should be accessed via [8] instead of (8).

However, Truffle's code is correct. In fact, changing (8) to [8] will result in Solidity compilation error --

TypeError: Indexed expression has to be a type, mapping or array (is function (uint256) view external returns (address))
        address adopter = adoption.adopters[8];
                          ^---------------^

What's the theory behind?

2

There is no direct access to the fields from another contract. The public keyword in address[16] public adopters will generate a getter function with the same name, hence adoption.adopters(8).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.