11

I would like to evaluate the purchase of that GPU for Ethereum Mining. Does someone already have benchmarks?

Improve this question
5
  • yeah we need more details... and have you tried mining on 15.12 and earlier drivers?
    – user2250
    May 24, 2016 at 8:32
  • Have a look at youtu.be/6bSjp-FKweo for an interesting test.
    – Nicolas Massart
    May 27, 2016 at 7:28
  • 1
    I am getting 59M/h reported but effective is way lower. Not sure why. Have been running dorp 48h and difference is about half. Tested both claymore and genoil ethermine
    – user1704
    Sep 26, 2016 at 20:22
  • use the firepro driver for 60+mhash
    – user4447
    Sep 28, 2016 at 5:34
  • @user4447 60+mh with <300w?
    – Gewure
    Mar 1, 2018 at 2:11

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
7

We just received ours ... 42m/h atm @ 370w ... mainly due to the 16.5.3 driver ...

Improve this answer
2
  • On what OS? It's lower than expected... How much did you pay for it?
    – Nicolas Massart
    May 17, 2016 at 5:42
  • this is a lot worse than expected. where you able to tweak it @bitsbetrippin?
    – Gewure
    Mar 1, 2018 at 2:10
5

No benchmark looks to be available and i think it's due to the fact that this card looks to be very expensive and quantity is limited. However, the pro duo seems to be a radeon fury x2. So you can imagine that, as fury x looks to be around 30MH/s, this card would be 60MH/s. However for the same hashrate you can use 3 radeon r9 290 with some oc and it will cost you less than $600 instead of $1800 for the pro duo. Hashrate is more a matter of memory interface speed than a mater of GPU power. AMD indicated a 4096 bits memory interface. This is huge. So you may have a very good hashrate. But is it valuable in front of multiple small cards? I don't know. Still power consumption will be lower with only 300W. So until you try, we won't know.

Improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.