It seems that specifying something less than uint256 counterintuitively increases gas costs (or at best makes them equal to uint256 with optimization).

And since the minimum write to storage is 32 bytes (256 bits), it doesn't seem like specifying uint8 would necessarily save you gas either.

In what cases could one use uint<256 to save on gas?

One possible example: in a struct, if you group/list 8 uint32 variables together, would writing to those 256 bits (which presumably are stored consecutively in one word) be the same storage / gas cost as a single uint256 in the struct?

1 Answer 1


Your intuition on the struct is correct. It's efficient to write multiple uint<256 into a struct because of struct tight packing. According to the solidity docs,

Structs and array data always start a new slot and occupy whole slots (but items inside a struct or array are packed tightly according to these rules).

Basically, it's efficient to use uint<256 inside of a struct (or an array). In these cases, you typically want use the smallest uint sizes you can get away with in order to keep the total struct size at or under 256bits.

I'm not sure if there are other examples where uint<256 is more efficient than uint, but I'm sure someone can think of something.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.