0

LemonEmail looks like a very interesting implementation of 100% decentralized messaging system with end-to-end encryption. From what I understand from the information available, it uses the Ethereum blockchain to transport the ‘metadata’ of messages sent through the system, and it uses IPFS to transport the encrypted messages.

But, does LemonEmail support Perfect Forward Secrecy? In other words, if a user's private key is compromised, can an attacker use it to go back and decrypt ALL of the messages that were EVER sent to that user, that were encrypted using the corresponding public key (being that the metadata and the encrypted messages could easily be accessed by the attacker, as they are presumably stored indefinitely in the Ethereum blockchain and IPFS)?

Reading LemonEmail's blog post, 'Behind-the-scenes look at Lemon Email', after 'What happens behind the scenes when you click send', it reads, 'The email is encrypted locally. This ensures we can never read your data. If the recipient is a Lemon Email user, the email is encrypted using their public key'. However, there is no mention here of any sort of ephemeral key exchange, as necessary for Perfect Forward Secrecy.

Does anyone know of anything to the contrary, that LemonEmail does in fact support Perfect Forward Secrecy?

0

I've done some research on this subject and LemonMail does not support Perfect Forward Secrecy, in fact implementation of pFS on email based system is a very hard problem to solve because you always loose a lot of the email-like features. Here you can see a discussion why it has problem on an email based system.

That all being said it's not impossible and some chat systems do exists with pFS, but LemonMail isn't one.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.