What is the preferred Inheritance for ERC20 token and why?

Question

I tried to deploy both ERC20 contracts with burn functionality over the remix and both seems to work fine, I am confused if one way should be preferred over the other. Since, openzeppelin contract wizard seems to implement the first way but for me the second also works just fine. Can someone point out where I am going wrong, inheritance is getting confusing for me.

    pragma solidity ^0.8.4;
    
    import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
    import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Burnable.sol";
    
    contract MyToken is ERC20, ERC20Burnable {
        constructor() ERC20("MyToken", "MTK") {
           _mint(msg.sender, 2000 * 10 ** decimals());
}
    }

OR

pragma solidity ^0.8.4;

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Burnable.sol";

contract MyToken is ERC20Burnable {
    constructor() ERC20("MyToken", "MTK") {
        _mint(msg.sender, 2000 * 10 ** decimals());
    }
}

Answer 1

Found this openzeppelin's discussion openzeppelin-contracts github discussion

Answer 2

ERC20Burnable inherits ERC20 contract so both ways are same.

https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/master/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Burnable.sol

Inheriting ERC20 contract as well explicitly in your contract and initializing it makes it a bit more descriptive