11

I start Parity software like so: parity -j

It takes a really long time to sync.

Is there any way to make it sync faster?

|improve this question
23

First of all, you can increase the cache size to speed up block processing, for example to 1GB with --cache-size 1024. Increase it even further if you have more memory available. I'm using 4096.

If you either have a hard drive, or a solid state disk, optimize the database compaction for each type with --db-compaction hdd or --db-compaction ssd respectively.

Make sure transaction tracing is off with --tracing off, however, this should be already the default behavior.

Use the fast pruning mode with --pruning fast which reduces the state size kept in the client. Recently, this is also the default for parity.

Make sure you sync in active mode with --mode active which does never stop actively syncing and importing blocks.

Finally, if you need to fresh sync your chain, do it in warp mode with --warp. This fetches the latest state and latest 30k blocks from the chain and makes your node usable within only a couple of minutes.

In one line:

parity --mode active --tracing off --pruning fast --db-compaction ssd --cache-size 1024
|improve this answer
  • I can test your one-liner but how do I initiate a fresh sync then? – Vesa Dec 4 '16 at 10:09
  • I am trying your one liner but it seems about as slow as the result I get with just -warp. Seems very slow around block #2427470 and the blocks before and after that. I need to know if I should just continue or start over from the beginning with the one liner? – Vesa Dec 4 '16 at 10:19
  • Answering my own question: deleting the whole .parity folder seems to do the trick. Just remember to backup the keys first if anyone else is reading this. – Vesa Dec 4 '16 at 11:29
  • Removing the `~/.parity/906a34e69aec8c0d`` subfolder is sufficient. – soc1c Dec 4 '16 at 15:32
  • --warp is on by default. Explicitly defining the flag gives error Found argument '--warp' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context. So now there is no need to include --warp in the command. – Ayushya Nov 2 '17 at 5:28
4

I believe the --warp flag is what you're looking for, as detailed on their wiki and announced on their blog.

parity --warp
|improve this answer
  • Is it necessary to start over from scratch or can I start with --warp when I already have 70% of the blockchain downloaded through parity -j? – Vesa Dec 3 '16 at 9:39
  • 1
    Deleting the blockchain and resyncing with --warp is faster than waiting for the rest of the 30%. – soc1c Dec 3 '16 at 10:28
  • I did not see much speed-up. Please note that I am using 1 GiB RAM to download my own private chain. @Richard Horrocks – alper Sep 11 '17 at 15:42
1

I would like to share my configurations that I derived from answer by Afri(5chdn) and have been using for syncing to mainnet. If not anyone else, it shall help me later ;)

config.toml

[parity]
mode = "active"
base_path = "$HOME/parityDatadir"

[footprint]
tracing = "off"
pruning = "fast"
db_compaction = "ssd"
cache_size = 4096

[network]
port = 30303
min_peers = 50
max_peers = 100

startParityMainnet.sh

nohup parity --config config.toml --unsafe-expose &

|improve this answer
1

Use this unless you know for sure you need more than what the light client has to offer.

parity --light
  1. Works well for and sets up a highly functional, light node(light nodes in ethereum are much more capable and safe compared to Bitcoin's)
  2. Downloads a chunk of verified blocks and only syncs few blocks after.
  3. If you are using a HDD, this make it possible to sync to the end as the current IO makes it (almost) impossible to sync without an SSD.

Also, running parity --light db kill will delete your existing chain data if you are already syncing.

|improve this answer

protected by eth♦ Dec 26 '17 at 0:02

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.