Timeline for Multiple transfers, one smart contract
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 15, 2023 at 19:12 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 9, 2023 at 5:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 5, 2022 at 9:57 | answer | added | immaxkent | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 5, 2022 at 7:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 29, 2022 at 10:16 | comment | added | Abhishek Sinha | InstanceOwner.transfer(Change) ; is missing | |
Jul 29, 2022 at 8:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Mar 29, 2022 at 9:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 22, 2021 at 22:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 25, 2021 at 5:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Mar 26, 2021 at 9:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 3, 2020 at 16:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 1, 2020 at 11:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 26, 2020 at 17:21 | answer | added | Prashant Prabhakar Singh | timeline score: 1 | |
May 26, 2020 at 14:21 | comment | added | Alejandro | All good! no offense taken :) | |
May 26, 2020 at 14:10 | comment | added | goodvibration |
What may be obvious for you may not be obvious for everyone. I made the assumption based on what I'm observing in my learnings - you are correct, I apologize for my conclusion.
|
|
May 26, 2020 at 12:49 | comment | added | Alejandro | Thanks for taking a look. What may be obvious for you may not be obvious for everyone. I made the assumption based on what I'm observing in my learnings. I provided an update on the post with more info. | |
May 26, 2020 at 12:46 | history | edited | Alejandro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added debugging info
|
May 26, 2020 at 12:25 | comment | added | goodvibration |
Another option is that one of those two recipients (InstanceOwner and InstanceBuyer ) is the address of a contract whose fallback function reverts when executed (or perhaps not even implemented).
|
|
May 26, 2020 at 12:23 | comment | added | goodvibration |
3. No, It IS possible. Sounds like there is simply not enough ether (less than Change + OfferPrice1 ) in the contract. Of all things, that should definitely be the first that comes to mind. How on earth did you start with "multiple transfers in a single contract not possible"???
|
|
May 26, 2020 at 12:22 | comment | added | goodvibration | 2. How exactly are you executing it? | |
May 26, 2020 at 12:21 | comment | added | goodvibration | 1. What is "a function payable error"? | |
May 26, 2020 at 11:49 | history | asked | Alejandro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |