Skip to main content
Ethereum

Return to Answer

replaced http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/ with https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

The issuance model is not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please note that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details herehere

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to control spending of funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.

The issuance model is not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please note that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details here

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to control spending of funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.

The issuance model is not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please note that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details here

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to control spending of funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.

Post Merged (destination) from ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/644/…
fixed typos, wording, and link
Source Link
Jeff Coleman
Jeff Coleman
  • 22.2k
  • 18
  • 78
  • 91

The issuance model itis not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please notenote that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details herehere

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to use spend thiscontrol spending of funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.

The issuance model it not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please note that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details here

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to use spend this funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.

The issuance model is not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please note that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details here

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to control spending of funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.

Source Link
mKoeppelmann
mKoeppelmann
  • 7.6k
  • 9
  • 36
  • 48

The issuance model it not fixed yet. It is an ongoing discussion whether or not the costs for the consensus needs to be financed by inflation that basically taxes every coin holder or if transaction fees are sufficient.

Please note that the costs for secure consensus are much lower with Casper compared to current proof of work. More details here

For this reason it is guaranteed, that the current issuance amount will not be increased and might even drop to 0. Another ongoing discussion is whether or not issues of new coins should be used to fund ongoing development. A prerequisites for this would be a DAO with a widely accepted mechanism to use spend this funds effectively. But also in this case the newly issued coins would not increase.