Skip to main content

Timeline for Access manager in Smart Contract

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 20, 2021 at 1:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 29, 2020 at 10:04 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 30, 2020 at 23:06 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 19, 2020 at 10:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 19, 2019 at 11:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 21, 2019 at 3:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 7, 2019 at 1:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:55 answer added Henk timeline score: 0
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:45 comment added Henk Let us continue this discussion in chat.
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:44 comment added Yooooomi My vision is more to encrypt data from a certain key, then allow or deny addresses from getting the key from the blockchain to decrypt this data
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:42 comment added Henk In this case, you could just not encrypt and publish the data using the deleted viewer's public key after an update.
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:40 comment added Yooooomi Everyone can copy data, everyone can screenshot or whatever, this is not the issue here :)
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:39 comment added Henk How would you handle the viewer copying the data before deleting them?
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:38 comment added Yooooomi The thing is I that I want to be able to dynamically manage permission to this key since the owner can add viewer and remove them on the go
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:35 comment added Henk You could use asymmetric encryption. I won't go into detail, but you could have the sender of the data encrypt it using the public key of the receiver, and store it either on the blockchain, or on IPFS or something, in which case you could store the data hash on the chain for verification. The public key is not the same as the address. It must either be provided by the receiver, or by deriving it from a signature of the receiver. There are ways to do that. After the data is stored on IPFS, the receiver can decrypt the data using their own private key.
Aug 21, 2018 at 9:11 history asked Yooooomi CC BY-SA 4.0