Timeline for Solidity: using low level call function on an EOA
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 25, 2022 at 0:47 | history | suggested | Sileo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved styling - minimal
|
| Apr 24, 2022 at 16:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 25, 2022 at 0:47 | |||||
| Jan 21, 2019 at 9:23 | vote | accept | juniz | ||
| Aug 17, 2018 at 13:27 | answer | added | user19510 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 17, 2018 at 11:00 | comment | added | Henk | @smarx Could you post your comment as an answer so people can find it more easily? | |
| Aug 17, 2018 at 8:33 | comment | added | user19510 | Yes, this call should succeed. In general, a call will succeed unless the receiving address reverts. The difference between an EOA and a contract is that the contract has code (and so that code might revert, e.g. if it doesn't have a given function defined and lacks a fallback function). An EOA doesn't have code, so it can't possibly revert. | |
| Aug 17, 2018 at 8:16 | history | asked | juniz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |