Skip to main content
Ethereum

Return to Answer

better english and formatting
Source Link
edit approved Dec 3, 2019 at 14:58
Ann Kilzer
edit approved Dec 3, 2019 at 14:58
Ann Kilzer
  • 380
  • 1
  • 16
  1. Who everWhoever is submitting the transaction call (nothing changes, a transaction is still a transaction).
  2. There is no way around this, other than keeepkeep the total number of exiters that could ever be around to be quite low. If you allow enough people onto your child-chain such that an exit can't even be performed due to reaching gas block limits, than your plasmaPlasma implementation was horribly designed (IMO).
  1. Who ever is submitting the transaction call (nothing changes, a transaction is still a transaction)
  2. There is no way around this, other than keeep the total number of exiters that could ever be around to be quite low. If you allow enough people onto your child-chain such that an exit can't even be performed due to reaching gas block limits, than your plasma implementation was horribly designed (IMO).
  1. Whoever is submitting the transaction call (nothing changes, a transaction is still a transaction).
  2. There is no way around this, other than keep the total number of exiters that could ever be around to be quite low. If you allow enough people onto your child-chain such that an exit can't even be performed due to reaching gas block limits, than your Plasma implementation was horribly designed (IMO).
Source Link
hextet
hextet
  • 1.6k
  • 9
  • 28

  1. Who ever is submitting the transaction call (nothing changes, a transaction is still a transaction)
  2. There is no way around this, other than keeep the total number of exiters that could ever be around to be quite low. If you allow enough people onto your child-chain such that an exit can't even be performed due to reaching gas block limits, than your plasma implementation was horribly designed (IMO).