Timeline for Create New Contract from within another contract of the same type in Solidity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 at 7:50 | vote | accept | Haya Raed | ||
| Apr 18, 2018 at 14:27 | answer | added | Micky Socaci | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 18, 2018 at 11:23 | comment | added | Haya Raed | when a factory creates all the contracts .. it is more centralized.. the factory manages all the other children.. where as I wanted to create a chain of contracts which are independent and thus make it less centralized. In my case as well, there are ether deposits based on certain conditions.. the factory method would make one contract hold all the ether which is not quite a good design | |
| Apr 17, 2018 at 23:42 | comment | added | Rob Hitchens | Just curious. From a pragmatic standpoint, what is advantageous about contract copying itself (versus summing a factory to do it) and what is meant by pointing forward, backward. Sounds like an ordered index. Some insight into the purpose of these constraints might yield a cleaner pattern. | |
| Apr 17, 2018 at 13:55 | answer | added | supakaity | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2018 at 13:48 | answer | added | Henk | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 17, 2018 at 13:41 | answer | added | FroiD | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2018 at 13:27 | history | asked | Haya Raed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |