Timeline for Getting a contract's fallback payable function to fire from another contract?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2018 at 18:37 | history | edited | Shane Fontaine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add formatting for future viewers
|
| Mar 15, 2018 at 19:51 | comment | added | user19510 |
Yes, I believe you're correct. If you want to forward more gas, you can use recipient_addr.call.value(n)(), where n is the amount of wei you want to send.
|
|
| Mar 15, 2018 at 19:48 | comment | added | Bobo Amitheson | I have added in the fallback function code. From the reading I have done would it be correct to say that the fallback function does not succeed because the operations of the fallback function would exceed the 2300 gas stipend that transfer / send has for the fallback function? | |
| Mar 15, 2018 at 19:47 | history | edited | Bobo Amitheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 564 characters in body
|
| Mar 15, 2018 at 19:21 | comment | added | user19510 |
The code you shared is correct and will trigger a payable fallback function in recipient_adr if it has one. If you're still having trouble, you'll need to share the full code (including the code behind recipient_adr) and how you're deploying the contract's and passing the address to this function, as well as the exact error you're seeing when you say it "does not work."
|
|
| Mar 15, 2018 at 18:42 | history | asked | Bobo Amitheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |