Skip to main content
added 271 characters in body
Source Link

I don't really get the problem you are having. You already answered your question yourself. Add a mapping(uint => uint) mintGroup or whatever variable type you need to map the specific tokenId to the group. Transfering the token does not change its id and thus will not change the mapping.

You could also add it as a variable in the token itself but handling those is really uncomfortable in comparison to using mapping.

EDIT: Beware that a token standard like ERC721 is needed to accomplish that. ERC20 standard will not work because every token is the same and therefore cannot store information about the reason of minting it.

I don't really get the problem you are having. You already answered your question yourself. Add a mapping(uint => uint) mintGroup or whatever variable type you need to map the specific tokenId to the group. Transfering the token does not change its id and thus will not change the mapping.

You could also add it as a variable in the token itself but handling those is really uncomfortable in comparison to using mapping.

I don't really get the problem you are having. You already answered your question yourself. Add a mapping(uint => uint) mintGroup or whatever variable type you need to map the specific tokenId to the group. Transfering the token does not change its id and thus will not change the mapping.

You could also add it as a variable in the token itself but handling those is really uncomfortable in comparison to using mapping.

EDIT: Beware that a token standard like ERC721 is needed to accomplish that. ERC20 standard will not work because every token is the same and therefore cannot store information about the reason of minting it.

Source Link

I don't really get the problem you are having. You already answered your question yourself. Add a mapping(uint => uint) mintGroup or whatever variable type you need to map the specific tokenId to the group. Transfering the token does not change its id and thus will not change the mapping.

You could also add it as a variable in the token itself but handling those is really uncomfortable in comparison to using mapping.