Timeline for Receiving payments from my clients on a website, and when each user is given his own address
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2022 at 9:12 | comment | added | lullis | 1) If you are not counting for the transaction from the customer to you, then yes, it's only one transaction that you will be paying per customer. But in a system where customers pay directly to your wallet, the total number of transactions you will be paying is zero. 2) After EIP-1159, there is very little difference between "average" and "lowest" cost. | |
| Nov 30, 2022 at 2:55 | comment | added | Kum |
1) there will be two transactions involved. -- there won't be. There could be 2) One doesn't have to use the average rate, one may use the lowest and slowest one
|
|
| Nov 28, 2022 at 14:19 | comment | added | lullis | 1) If you have only one wallet, your customers will be transferring their funds to you directly, there is only one on-chain transaction. If you want them to pay into an account that is assigned to them but managed by you, there will be two transactions involved. The first when they transfer to their "managed" wallet, the second when you cash out those funds to your "actual wallet". 2) As of today (Nov 28th, 2022), the ETH transfer is averaging $0.37. Transfers of ERC20 tokens are even higher. | |
| Nov 27, 2022 at 17:25 | comment | added | Kum |
The main issue of this scheme is that you will have to pay to move your funds out of the "user-assigned" account to the one where you'll collect your revenue. --> 1) one would have to funds in other scheme anyway 2) it doesn't a few dollars, rather it's a few cents or a few dozens of cents
|
|
| S Nov 21, 2022 at 20:04 | review | First answers | |||
| Nov 28, 2022 at 18:22 | |||||
| S Nov 21, 2022 at 20:04 | history | answered | lullis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |