Timeline for Why is noone exploiting the DAO contract?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 15, 2021 at 22:31 | history | bounty ended | Ismael♦ | ||
| S Aug 15, 2021 at 22:31 | history | notice removed | Ismael♦ | ||
| Aug 10, 2021 at 14:33 | vote | accept | John1 | ||
| Aug 9, 2021 at 1:52 | answer | added | Yakitori | timeline score: 5 | |
| S Aug 8, 2021 at 22:33 | history | bounty started | Ismael♦ | ||
| S Aug 8, 2021 at 22:33 | history | notice added | Ismael♦ | Draw attention | |
| S Aug 8, 2021 at 22:04 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 8, 2021 at 22:04 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 5, 2021 at 18:05 | answer | added | CQM | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 1, 2021 at 0:27 | comment | added | Undead8 | Hacking is pretty much the intentional action of exploiting code mistakes in order to cause an unintended result. The DAO hacker claimed in an open letter that he was exercising a feature of the DAO because the contract allowed to withdraw Eth in this way, and not hacking, which is idiotic. The context obviously matters, otherwise pretty much any code exploit would be legal and fair game. The DAO contract was illegally hacked in the sense that the attacker exploited an unintended vulnerability in the code. | |
| S Jul 31, 2021 at 20:36 | history | bounty started | Ismael♦ | ||
| S Jul 31, 2021 at 20:36 | history | notice added | Ismael♦ | Draw attention | |
| Jul 8, 2021 at 6:11 | comment | added | Itération 122442 | Just as a note, it was note "hacked". It was a code mistake. | |
| Jul 8, 2021 at 5:43 | history | asked | John1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |